6 Comments
User's avatar
Chali’s Food for Thought.'s avatar

I think it is worth investigating parasites as a cause of cancer. In recent years there have been a number of stories about this and in the 1980’s a Dr Weber showed parasites under a microscope demonstrating clumping behaviour creating tumours.

Daniel Flora, MD's avatar

Again, I’ll just make the comment that this not how we are practicing oncology in the real world. Genomics 🧬 are only one piece of the bigger puzzle.

https://substack.com/@dfloramd/note/c-151648856?r=11bw2f&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

Stuart Hutt's avatar

A good history of why genetics is not the cause of cancer. I think Dr Jerry Tennant makes a good case it is a lack of electrons and different nutrients. We are electrical and frequency beings. Based on Dr Tennant's analysis our cells require to maintain a healthy voltage -25mv/7.45 pH. As this voltage drops our cells (liquid) have less ability to absorb oxygen. Once polarity reverses, cancer. Other problem areas are the aluminum injected into us causing autism/Alzheimer's based on Dr Christopher Exley's brain biopsy research. Add the 4lb of aluminum we injest in food/drink every year, (Dr Robert Vogel May 2025 study). Dr Jerry Tennant book Healing is Voltage Cancer's On/Off Switch: Polarity is an excellent history of cancer, therapies and causal factors.

Aesop Disciple's avatar

I love the proximate cause vs ultimate cause dualism. Where the heck did that come from? It has far more implications beyond feeding behavior and cancer, although the use here is perfectly applied.

Is there a philosopher? It seems kind of Stoic, or perhaps Aristotelian. Where can I read more about proximate vs ultimate causation? At any rate, you just got $80 and a Facebook recommendation. LOL! Thanks Dr. Fung

Glyn's avatar

Very well Explained.

Thank you.

The Life Within's avatar

Saying "this is random" is already such a red flag, not scientific at all