Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Malcolm Richardson's avatar

Many papers and books have been written about the blue zones and even careers have been built on them. Although many other factors could also explain the apparent longevity in theses areas, such as genetics, smoking and alcohol habits, physical activity, social connections and other lifestyle factors, people always seem too willing to assume that it must be their diets that are responsible for their apparent longevity.

However, the biggest problem with the concept of blue zones is that it has been debunked. When Dr Saul Newman at the Australian National University (and now University College London) studied them, he found that the single best predictor of longevity in these groups was the absence of a birth certificate! The people in these groups lied about their age and they had good reason to do so.

As already noted, the people of Okinawa were the poorest in Japan, especially at the end of WWII. Many were literally starving. Government assistance was only available to people over a certain age. As most public records in Okinawa had been destroyed in the war, it was a simple thing to put one’s age up, especially when it was the only way to survive. It was a similar story in Sardinia.

A good place to start learning about this is here: https://www.science.org/content/article/do-blue-zones-supposed-havens-longevity-rest-shaky-science

I think it would be good if people stopped invoking the so-called “Blue Zones” to support their dietary narrative.

Heather Hausenblas, PhD's avatar

Had not heard of the unblue zones.

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?